This is site and the coming Federal suit[s] are and will be about  Alabama Public Service Commission and Alabama Power policies, practices and customs, specifically, Alabama Power’s refusal of service, based upon the unpaid past bill of  someone else had failed to pay, and demand the person seeking service to pay the other person’s alleged debt before service will be provided.


Alabama Public Service Commission has been made aware of the above policy and has acquiesces in this policy. Complaints filed with the Alabama Public Service Commission as to Alabama Power’s debt collection practices failed to receive basic constitutional rights, access to court, unbiased decisions maker, due process and equal protection.

In Goldenstein v. Repossessors Inc., 815 F.3d 142 (2016) a Federal court address such conduct, collection of, unenforceable and usurious debts, and ruled that it was racketeering. The practice of illegal debit collection of, unenforceable and usurious debts, is a criminal enterprise, racketeering.

18 U.S. Code § 1964 - Civil remedies, racketeering

(a) The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of section 1962 of this chapter by issuing appropriate orders, including, but not limited to: ordering any person to divest himself of any interest, direct or indirect, in any enterprise; imposing reasonable restrictions on the future activities or investments of any person, including, but not limited to, prohibiting any person from engaging in the same type of endeavor as the enterprise engaged in, the activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or ordering dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons.
(b) The Attorney General may institute proceedings under this section. Pending final determination thereof, the court may at any time enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other actions, including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as it shall deem proper.
(c)Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, except that no person may rely upon any conduct that would have been actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities to establish a violation of section 1962. The exception contained in the preceding sentence does not apply to an action against any person that is criminally convicted in connection with the fraud, in which case the statute of limitations shall start to run on the date on which the conviction becomes final.
(d)A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding brought by the United States under this chapter shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding brought by the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 1962 unenforceable and usurious debt, racketeering


(b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce


42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.

 

The above Class Acton, suit[s], has not been file, but is being planned; this site will be updated with additional information.
AlabamaPowerClassAction.com  

AlabamaPowerClassAction@mail.com